« Do You Hear What I Hear? | Main | Who Decides? Who Has a Voice, Who Has a Vote and Who Makes the Call? »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

This post resonates a lot with Paul Hebert's recent post comparing smoking with incentives. The once-a-year type of recognition won't do much to re-enforce and/or modify behaviors. Those non-cash forms of recognition throughout the year definitely takes the burden off of huge cash bonuses at the end of every year

Appreciate the comparison to Paul, Drew. That's a huge compliment, indeed!

Yes, if the goal is to reinforce or modify *behavior*, once-a-year (or even once-a-quarter) programs simply won't cut it. In the moment, specific, actionable and authentic praise and recognition is the way to go for true behavior change.

There are a lot of good points here, Derek. For example, inflated bonuses creating negative incentives on Wall Street. Or the silliness of letting people walk for lack of appreciation. I couldn't agree more about the importance of recognition throughout the year - not just good business but good business etiquette - but I also think the cash needs to be there as well. If you tell someone how great they are every day for a year then fail to provide any sort of monetary reward it starts to sound like lip service - the good news is that if you show appreciation you don't have to try to make up for lack of appreciation with unreasonably inflated cash bonuses. Appreciation isn't a replacement for cash, it's another incentive that satisfies a different need.

Nice article and it comes at a good time for me as I'm working with a new prospective client that is struggling with their compensation packages which, in recent years, has included significant year-end bonuses to senior executives with no real criteria on which they are based. I think we're going to need to restructure that program.

I also agree with Laura's comments regarding on-going positive recognition for achievement throughout the year needing to lead to some type of year-end salary adjustment/bonus, etc.

But, at least it will be based on a valid recognition of true contribution that both parties have agreed on, instead of being seen as arbitrary and capricious or non-existent and the employee is left guessing what they need to do because the feedback isn't specific enough for anyone to effectively judge or be judged.

Skip, "arbitrary and capricious" -- that's what performance reviews are to far too many employees the world over. Thanks for chiming in with that. It's an important consideration, as well.

The comments to this entry are closed.