Editor's Note: Jim Brennan points out that not all the silly questions posed in professional forums are the idea of the unfortunate asker. A Classic lesson on keeping our sense of humor, humility and sympathy when responding to our colleagues online.
Many “dumb questions” are voiced in response to management orders, so be charitable when you encounter an overly basic query from people who are supposed to know better. For example, a question about Canadians being treated exactly like Americans for overtime purposes was raised a while ago in a LinkedIn professional discussion forum.
Since the two nations have very different laws governing overtime, the answer seemed simple. But it brought this private response: Thanks Jim - My thoughts exactly, but I was asked to do the research. While I had been pretty sure this wasn’t her idea, it was good to know that she was given that specific task to complete, because any human resource professional and especially a rewards specialist should have known that answer.
Nevertheless, forums for professional discussion are filled with such silly questions. Examples include:
- What is the pay inflation rate?
- How is the cost of labor different from cost of living?
- Why are lump sum payments superior to base pay increases?
- Doesn’t everyone everywhere want exactly the same rewards?
There is a lesson here. Rather than criticize the inquirer when you receive a technical question with a rather obvious answer, it might be more appropriate to express sympathy for their plight. The boss may have issued a directive to bring back a precise answer to a specific question. Being commanded to ask a "dumb" question is no fun. The unfortunate staffer is typically required to supply a direct response from outside experts that answers the exact question as defined by some senior executive. The fact that the inside employee already knows the answers will cut no ice with some people. Brennan’s Law #3 on Consulting applies: When management concludes that someone from the outside is always smarter than an employee, they are saying, "no one with any brains could be expected to work here."
The implications are painful. First, they have no trust in your competence. Second, they don’t understand how the question that baffles a high-ranking executive like them simply displays their ignorance about matters that should be clear to any well educated manager. While there can be other implications, too, solutions to the first two alone may be impossible to achieve. If you can consistently demonstrate over time that your initial answer is always backed up by independent objectives sources, you may become trusted. But there is little you can do to make up for the defects of whatever education system or experience history that produced your boss.
Situations inspired by feckless superiors might be best handled by reference to the latest Dilbert cartoons. A sense of humor can be essential for survival in this field, and the camaraderie of friendly fellow professionals helps, as well. With that in mind, what was the goofiest question you have received from a boss?
E. James (Jim) Brennan is an independent compensation advisor with extensive total rewards experience in most industries. After corporate HR posts and consulting CEO roles, he was Senior Associate of pay surveyor ERI before returning to consulting in 2015. A prolific writer (author of the Performance Management Workbook), speaker and frequent expert witness in reasonable executive compensation court cases, Jim also serves on the Advisory Board of the Compensation and Benefits Review.
Creative Commons image "Question Box" by Raymond Bryson
Comments